Alright, so I noticed two mentions of it in another thread of mine, Disturbing, much?, so I've made a thread to discuss a certain man:
Adam Lambert and his fun, provocative performance at the AMAs on November 22, 2009.
In addition to dragging a female dancer around by the ankles, pushing a male dancer's head into his crotch and simulating oral sex, walking a pair of male hoofers around like dogs on a leash, and furiously thrusting his hips at every opportunity, Lambert took a moment mid-song to fervently make out with (an allegedly straight) male keyboard player. After the jaw-dropping performance, Lambert told CNN that the forceful smooch was "in the moment" and was not a planned part of his routine.
Appearing to preemptively strike back at anyone who took issue with the S&M-heavy imagery of the night-closing routine for its risqué nature, Lambert said those who object are engaging in "a form of discrimination and a double standard," considering that for decades, "women performers have been pushing the envelope."
Lambert repeated that double-standard line of reasoning with Rolling Stone backstage after the show, telling the mag, "Female performers have been doing this for years — pushing the envelope about sexuality — and the minute a man does it, everybody freaks out. We're in 2009 — it's time to take risks, be a little more brave, time to open people's eyes and if it offends them, then maybe I'm not for them. My goal was not to piss people off, it was to promote freedom of expression and artistic freedom." - Source, Lambert says the kiss was 'in the moment'
America is, apparently, freaking out because of the double standard that Adam challenged. But the real question is - did Adam go too far over the top while trying to make his point? Was the performance completely tackles and vulgar and is more damaging than good? From what I've read, quite a few of the older men in the gay community seem to think so.
Or is America completely overreacting? Adam has a point. Women in the music industry have gotten more and more provocative and yet they're not really censored, some are even commended for it. So, if Adam was girl, would America have been fine with the performance? In my opinion? Probably. From my understanding the big hoopla is because Adam is a man, and being gay on top of it has just made him more of a target for such a 'shocking' show.
Really, I commend Adam for his attitude and I could give a shit if his performance was extreme. Kudos to him for deciding to say "Fuck it" to America and do what he wants to do. Raise hell, Adam Lambert, raise hell. Oh wait! You already have. I tip my hat to you, my dear sir. And let me say you've made me a fan and I'll be downloading your CD asap.
So discus it, debate it, I know you want to. Should Adam have gone about challenging the double standard differently? Do you commend him for it, loathe him? There are so many opinions and points anyone can make on this. I'm looking forward to a good discussion.
Note: Considering this thread is about an event that transpired and not the music of the artist himself, I'm posting it here in the Community Discussion. If any mods think it should be moved to Music, go right ahead.


Affiliates & Links












Reply With Quote



He got guts! 











also would like to add, hey the two guys from taladega nights: ricky bobby's story are suposeable straight and their kiss one one of those statue prizie things and they did a repeat performance on stage... the only time i have ever watched those grammie things, to bad it was more of a funny thing then a g d that was hella hot thing^^




